shooter
| » no one lives foreve... |
| « medieval battle col... |
| · sitemap |
| SERCountTM Ratings | |
|---|---|
| Popularity | 182,000 |
New World Order
The following report compares gadgets using the SERCount Rating (base on the result count from the search engine).
Note: due to some search engine quota, not all result is available yet.
Rating: 3/5 from 3 reviews Incredible realismGreatOK, unless you have a good computer you cant really get the best out of this game, like the guy who has written the other review. I happen to have a TOP spec computer in the form of an Alienware Aurora DDR (3.0Ghz 800mhz FSB, 1gig Corsair XMS RAM, Audigy plat. 2 EX soundcard), the sound is brilliant with a good speaker setup(6.1 Megaworx 600watt) and a brilliant graph card (Geforce FX 5800 Ultra), so if you have all that then go for it, the game rocks, esp. in multiplayer mode. You can get by with a P4 2.4GHZ too, and a Ti4600, 512Mb RAM, 300 watt speakers(5.1), with that spec. it will run smooth enough for you to have minimal problems. Amazon.com needs a zero rating just for NWOAvoid this game at all costs. The framerate drops into single digits during gameplay, which means it's choppy almost all the time. Once you get into a firefight, it gets so bad, it's almost unplayable. Voice acting is a joke, it sounds like it was recorded on a home PC on the cheapest mic you could find. Graphics are dated about 1994, slightly better than Wofenstein 3D, slightly worse than Quake I. The missions are generic, and the only real difficulty to this game is surviving the rounds because of all the chop caused by the slow framerate. This game is bound for the discount bin, and even then, I wouldn't recommend it. | ||||||||||||||||||
Downside- THIS IS NOT FOR KIDS 16 AND UNDER! EXTREMELY VIOLENT. In addition, the game will suck up a ton of RAM and may not operate well on slow low RAM computers. Nevertheless, even with the hassles, a fantastic game to play!!