for the serious |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sony DSC-F828Which one make me look professional? The following SERCountTM Ratings Report uses the search engine result count to rank popularity. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POPULAR HAT - 2007-11-04 11:35:00 | © Copyright 2004 - www.hat.net () | sitemap | top |
My personal theory is that Sony managed to improve the camera between the time the first review samples went out and when mine was built.
On a recent trip lots of great and costly cameras were in heavy use by fellow travelers, including the new Canon Digital Rebel. So far as I could tell, none of those cameras got better pictures of that trip than the Sony, and most of them had to worry a lot more about dust and water, due to their interchangeable and add-on lenses.
My one caution is that you can't use the 30 FPS movie mode with CompactFlash memory. That is only allowed with MemoryStickPro memory or a Hitachi CompactFlash hard disk. If that matters, get LOTS of memory, as even 15 FPS used over 100 MB in 5 minutes.
One other suggestion: cover the rear LCD display with a clear plastic sheet (such as is sold to protect Palm and Pocket PC PDAs.)
Highly recommended!
Update: A useful firmware upgrade has since become available at Sony's web site.