GPS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Geko 101Which is the best GPS? The following SERCountTM Ratings Report uses the search engine result count to rank popularity. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POPULAR HAT - 2007-11-04 11:35:00 | © Copyright 2004 - www.hat.net () | sitemap | top |
The main pro for this unit (other than price) is size - it's smaller than the next products up the line and easier to just stick in your pocket.
The main con is battery life. The amount of time you get out of 2 AAAs is not so hot. You'll eat up a pair of batteries every time you go out. I counter this by only turning the unit on to get my bearings. With a device that uses AA batteries I would be able to leave it on and use the tracklog/backtrack features. I think about it...
Some other factors to consider;
Display - once you go up above the basic etrex yellow unit the garmin units have higher-res displays, which are nice.
Connectivity - you can do ok without it, but this model is the only one that does not allow waypoint download (not sure about the 201.) Experienced geocachers favor the higher-end models with more memory. They load large numbers of cache waypoints into memory and are ready to go no matter where they are in their home area. If you're a more casual hiker/cacher, then the cheaper models do just as good a job - even this one.
Mapping - the gekkos and the etrex yellow will show you where your waypoints are in relation to each other, but don't show any other features. The more expensive models can do natural features and even uploaded topo maps.
You can GeoCache with almost any GPS. The Etrex yellow is the standard, but this has served me well. Happy Caching!